linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1K38JN-0003H0-J9@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:34:49 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	matthew@....cx
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...hat.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	agruen@...e.de, jjohansen@...e.de,
	penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create

> > I maintain, that moving lsm hooks into callers is insane.  And that's
> > *the* sanest alternative that anybody has been able to come up with to
> > passing down vfsmounts into the vfs.
> 
> Not so.  I showed how pathname-based security could be done *without*
> passing vfsmounts down at all.  Unfortunately, you weren't interested.

Umm, not sure what you are referring to.  Could you please give a
pointer?  I'm sure the apparmor developers would be more than
interested in such a scheme, if it does indeed work.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/