[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87f94c370806021007i5df45716u38f5b7ce525c03b0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:07:01 -0400
From: "Greg Freemyer" <greg.freemyer@...il.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Mark Lord" <liml@....ca>, "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
"Kristen Carlson Accardi" <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: power off unused ports
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>>
>> For the power-off of unused ports, the current patch still sounds
>> extremely vendor-specific (Intel).
>>
>> Does it actually work (demonstrate, please) on any other hardware ?
>
> Ding... correct. We need something per-port that's not Intel specific.
>
> Jeff
But, isn't Alan correct that the new logic is useful to some and with
a simple boot option is can be used to enable / disable it.
So if it is defaulted it to disabled, and the end user is allowed to
have a boot option to enable it, you get a reasonable first step for
now.
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf
The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists