linux-kernel - Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:59:46 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Cc:	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc

> Of course if you have to check of the DCD changed, that may not be
> constant.  A check for whether this device currently has anyone that
> wants the timestamp though should be a constant time.

Not having to take the cost of that for other users is far more important
than a time variance of a jump prediction. CPU cache effects alone will
add way more variance already. It's not a meaningful number to chase
compared to the randomness introduced by the IRQ handling itself.

If you want perfect accuracy do what I²IT did years ago and use a card
which timestamps the physical IRQ bus transition and exposes it to the OS.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/