[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080602055548.GA4296@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 01:55:48 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
agruen@...e.de, jjohansen@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] Make d_path() consistent across mount operations
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:38:35PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > The path that __d_path() computes can become slightly inconsistent when it
> > > races with mount operations: it grabs the vfsmount_lock when traversing mount
> > > points but immediately drops it again, only to re-grab it when it reaches the
> > > next mount point. The result is that the filename computed is not always
> > > consisent, and the file may never have had that name. (This is unlikely, but
> > > still possible.)
> > >
> > > Fix this by grabbing the vfsmount_lock for the whole duration of
> > > __d_path().
> >
> > Looks good, and lock holding times shouldn't be a problem either.
>
> Thanks for the review of this batch.
>
> Can you please in the future either explicitly ACK or NACK? Because I
> really wouldn't want any more of this "Looks good, but bla bla bla"
> and then NACKing the patch when I send it off to Andrew.
ACK for patches 1-3.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists