lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806012331m7c57468bu820e9b6b0184836d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:31:19 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1

Hi,

2.6.26-rc4 seems to exhibit the following (new since at least 2.6.24)
warning when running find /proc/1:

find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
in your filesystem driver.  Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
option.  Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
should have been searched.

# ls -l /proc/1
total 0
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 auxv
--w------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 clear_refs
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 cmdline
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 coredump_filter
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 cwd -> /
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 environ
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 exe -> /bin/bash
dr-x------ 2 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 fd
dr-x------ 2 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 fdinfo
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 limits
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 maps
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 mem
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 mountinfo
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 mounts
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 mountstats
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 net
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 oom_adj
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 oom_score
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 pagemap
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 root -> /
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 smaps
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 stat
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 statm
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 status
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 task
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun  2 02:20 wchan

# stat /proc/1
  File: `/proc/1'
  Size: 0               Blocks: 0          IO Block: 1024   directory
Device: 3h/3d   Inode: 39          Links: 5
Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2008-06-02 02:19:07.418398897 -0400
Modify: 2008-06-02 02:19:07.418398897 -0400
Change: 2008-06-02 02:19:07.418398897 -0400

The other /proc/pid entries seem to have the same problem.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ