linux-kernel - Re: AT91SAM9/CAP9 watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080602075808.3b854855@core>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 07:58:08 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Andrew Victor" <avictor.za@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, wim@...ana.be,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AT91SAM9/CAP9 watchdog driver


> +static long at91_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> +		unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> +	int __user *p = argp;

No locking.. so you could get two set timeout calls in parallel. Probably
you need a simple mutex in at91_wdt_settimeout();


> +	res = misc_register(&at91wdt_miscdev);
> +	if (res)
> +		return res;
> +
> +	/* Set watchdog */
> +	if (at91_wdt_settimeout(wdt_timeout) == -EINVAL) {
> +		pr_info("at91sam9_wdt: timeout must be between 1 and %d.\n",
> +			WDT_MAX_TIME);
> +		return 0;

At the moment those two are safe. When the open lock_kernel
goes away it will be possible to get

			misc_register
						open
						ioctl
			wdt_settimout()

So you may want to swap those two around (and disable the timer if the
register fails ?), or lock the open against the register routine.

Otherwise looks good.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/