linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080603114921.GX28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:49:21 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, drepper@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> > Is there anything else where the file descriptor's access mode allows
> > doing things on Linux, but the standard requires a permissions check
> > each time?
> 
> Jamie,
> 
> I can't think of examples offhand -- but I'm also not quite sure what
> your question is about.  Could you say a little more?

"Is anything else equally stupid?", I suspect...  AFAICS, behaviour in
question is inherited from futimes(2) in one of the *BSD - nothing to
do about that now (at least 10 years too late).  It's rather inconsistent
with a lot of things, starting with "why utimes(2) has weaker requirements
with NULL argument", but we are far too late to fix that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/