[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080603121015.GC28905@shareable.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:10:15 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, drepper@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:01:35PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > with a lot of things, starting with "why utimes(2) has weaker requirements
> > > with NULL argument", but we are far too late to fix that.
> >
> > To be fair, having a writable file descriptor only lets you change the
> > mtime to "now", and having a readable file descriptor only lets you
> > change the atime to "now".
> >
> > Changing the times _in general_ can be seen as over-reaching those
> > capabilities and arguably justifies more strict checks.
>
> Which is what all questions about writability apply only to NULL case
> anyway...
Oh!
So if I have the file descriptor, I can just as well change the mtime
by read a byte and write it back. Or even do a zero-length write, on
some OSes.
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists