[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48456225.6070505@bull.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:24:21 +0200
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] netns: Enable tagging for net_class directories
in sysfs
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:08PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
>> net: Enable tagging for net_class directories in sysfs
>>
>> The problem. Network devices show up in sysfs and with the network
>> namespace active multiple devices with the same name can show up in
>> the same directory, ouch!
>>
>> To avoid that problem and allow existing applications in network namespaces
>> to see the same interface that is currently presented in sysfs, this
>> patch enables the tagging directory support in sysfs.
>>
>> By using the network namespace pointers as tags to separate out the
>> the sysfs directory entries we ensure that we don't have conflicts
>> in the directories and applications only see a limited set of
>> the network devices.
>
> I don't like it how the network subsystem is starting to leach into the
> sysfs core here. What happens when the next subsystem wants to do the
> same thing? And then the next one? Will they all have to do this kind
> of intrusive changes to sysfs?
>
> Can't this be done only in the network subsystem?
I'm not sure to understand exactly what you mean.
What you don't like is seeing these hunks of network code in
fs/sysfs/mount.c? And you prefer to see these bits of code resides in
the network subsystem instead and see only "generic" sysfs services in
fs/sysfs/mount.c?
If this is it, I have some idea to implement a less intrusive
sysfs_net_exit(), which can be shared with the other namespaces.
Serge introduces the same kind of changes in patch 10 to fix an issue in
user namespace. I think we can share a bit of code and move the parts
specific to each namespace in their own subsystems.
Benjamin
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
--
B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D
http://www.bull.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists