[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806031930.09556.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:30:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks (not word wrapped)
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> @@ -42,22 +42,48 @@
> */
> #define HVC_ALLOC_TTY_ADAPTERS 8
>
> +struct hvc_struct {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + int index;
> + struct tty_struct *tty;
> + unsigned int count;
> + int do_wakeup;
> + char *outbuf;
> + int outbuf_size;
> + int n_outbuf;
> + uint32_t vtermno;
> + struct hv_ops *ops;
> + int data;
> + struct list_head next;
> + struct kref kref; /* ref count & hvc_struct lifetime */
> +};
>
I don't see a reason to make this data structure known to other files,
so why not leave it in hvc_console.c?
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HVC_IRQ
> +/* default notifier for irq based notification */
> +extern int notifier_add_irq(struct hvc_struct *hp, int irq);
> +extern void notifier_del_irq(struct hvc_struct *hp, int irq);
> +#endif
> #endif // HVC_CONSOLE_H
Please remove the #ifdef around the declarations.
h Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists