[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878wxmfg99.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:52:18 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] UML - Deal with host time going backwards
On 3 Jun 2008, Daniel Hazelton said:
> On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:32:11 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:02:35 -0400
>>
>> Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> wrote:
>> > Protection against the host's time going backwards - keep track of the
>> > time at the last tick and if it's greater than the current time, keep
>> > time stopped until the host catches up.
>>
>> Strange. What would cause the host's time (or at least UML's perception
>> of it) to go backwards?
>
> A wild guess would be that the UML process is running "fast" at some point and
> its expectation of the host's time is skewed forward because of that.
Quite so. Simply running ntp on the host (in slew-only mode, no less!)
can cause this.
> Another possibility is that the hosts clock got reset between the times UML
> has checked it and the correction was a negative one.
That too.
--
`If you are having a "ua luea luea le ua le" kind of day, I can only
assume that you are doing no work due [to] incapacitating nausea caused
by numerous lazy demons.' --- Frossie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists