| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080603132231.1430f812.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:22:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, miklos@...redi.hu, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jamie@...reable.org, drepper@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch) On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:13:58 +0200 Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> wrote: > This patch fixes all of the utimensat() bugs outlined in my > previous mail. > > I could have split the patch out into a few pieces, but given > that it is not long, and all against a single file, I've made > one patch. Let me know if you would like separate patches for > the pieces below. Well I think it would have been better, really. Right now someone (apparently me) needs to take the text from "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (overview)" and weave it together with the text from "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)" to produce a vaguely coherent changelog. It all would be much saner and cleaner if each of these changes was in a self-contained diff which had its own standalone changelog, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists