linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080603150346.4611b5ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:03:46 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()
 and update_nodemask()

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be
> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE
> offline/online.

Unfortunately this patch conflicts with
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch

Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense.  ie: that
we did not revert the effects of that bugfix.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/