[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4844C938.7030401@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:31:52 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com, adilger@...sterfs.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jbacik@...hat.com, cmm@...ibm.com, tytso@....edu,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] jbd: fix error handling for checkpoint io
Hello,
Thank you for reviewing.
Jan Kara wrote:
>>@@ -347,6 +361,8 @@ restart:
>> break;
>> }
>> retry = __process_buffer(journal, jh, bhs,&batch_count);
>>+ if (retry < 0)
>>+ result = retry;
>
> Here you update result whenever retry is < 0 and below when result == 0.
> I think it's better to have these two consistent (not that it would be
> currently any functional difference).
I fixed it.
> Only please add a comment in front of
> log_do_checkpoint() that it's supposed to be called with j_checkpoint_mutex
> held so that EIO propagation works correctly.
I added a comment.
I'll send the revised patch soon.
Thanks,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists