linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vmallocinfo: Add NUMA informations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080603133247.B6E0.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:35:13 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmallocinfo: Add NUMA informations

> >> +		for (nr = 0; nr < MAX_NUMNODES; nr++)
> >> +			if (counters[nr])
> >> +				seq_printf(m, " N%u=%u", nr, counters[nr]);
> >
> > for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY) is better?
> > because MAX_NUMNODES has offten very large value.
> >   
> Yes, good idea, thank you.
> 
> I also used nr_node_ids instead of MAX_NUMNODES in this second version :

Thank you! looks goot to me.
and, my test fouund no bug.

	Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>


Cristoph, What do you think?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/