linux-kernel - Re: [Question] about modules/inline benefits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:54:41 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Question] about modules/inline benefits

Am Dienstag 03 Juni 2008 09:28:59 schrieb Sitsofe Wheeler:
> Modules allow you to support more hardware as there is a maximum size of the
> core kernel image.

But you pay for every module with half a page of unused RAM and module
code will be in vmalloced memory thus increases TLB pressure a bit.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/