[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212570402.9496.72.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:06:42 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC devel <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions
with callbacks (not word wrapped)
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:49 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> This patch tries to change hvc_console to not use request_irq/free_irq if
> the backend does not use irqs. This allows virtio_console to use hvc_console
> without having a linker reference to request_irq/free_irq.
>
> The irq specific code is moved to hvc_irq.c and selected by the drivers that
> use irqs (System p, System i, XEN).
>
> I replaced "irq" with the opaque name "data". The request_irq and free_irq
> calls are replaced with notifier_add and notifier_del. I have also changed
> the code a bit to call the notifier_add and notifier_del inside the spinlock
> area as the callbacks are found via hp->ops.
>
> Feedback is appreciated.
I haven't looked at the patch proper but I agree with the basic
premises. We routinely use hvc_console for things that don't have an
irq. In fact, David even did a backend hooking up to udbg which is
useful when bringing up weird stuffs :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists