[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212570622.14371.19.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:10:22 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...e.cz,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] add a printk_init variant storing format
strings in __initdata
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 01:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > We're going to want to be able to call printk_init() from modules.
> > Please fix and test that, if we decide to proceed.
>
> Can we fix that by making it an alias for printk in the module case?
>
> The only reason we need it to be __init is so that we get the section
> warnings when you use it from non-init code, right? Won't we get the
> warning when non-init code refers to the string in initdata anyway?
In fact, wasn't the warning Andy showed such a warning?
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function something() to the variable .init.data:__printk_init_fmt.31426
> The function something() references
> the variable __initdata __printk_init_fmt.31426.
> This is often because something lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of __printk_init_fmt.31426 is wrong.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists