[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080604004311.GA30863@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:43:11 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, apw@...dowen.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
mingo@...e.hu, pbadari@...ibm.com, shaggy@...tin.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, zach.brown@...cle.com
Subject: Re: + x86-implement-pte_special.patch added to -mm tree
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:53:22PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 6/3/08, akpm@...ux-foundation.org <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > The patch titled
> > x86: implement pte_special
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> > x86-implement-pte_special.patch
>
> ...
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Subject: x86: implement pte_special
> > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> >
> > Implement the pte_special bit for x86. This is required to support
> > lockless get_user_pages, because we need to know whether or not we can
> > refcount a particular page given only its pte (and no vma).
>
> Wait... what the heck is a "special" page? Isn't that a terrible name
> for _anything_? Or is there a tradition to the name? It sounds like it
> should be named "novma" or "autonomous" or something instead.
> Something that carries at least a little more information than
> "special". Where can I find the documentation for this bit?
It's the logical opposite of a "normal" page.
> Has this been discussed on LKML? Is the name a result of consensus or whim?
It has been posted many times.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists