[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806041420.49316.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:20:48 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com,
mokuno@...sony.co.jp, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12]: wext: Dispatch and handle compat ioctls entirely in net/wireless/wext.c
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, David Miller wrote:
> Next we can kill the hacks in fs/compat_ioctl.c and also
> dispatch compat ioctls down into the driver and 80211 protocol
> helper layers in order to handle iw_point objects embedded in
> stream replies which need to be translated.
Great work! Thanks for getting one large chunk of fs/compat_ioctl.c
removed on the way.
> diff --git a/include/net/wext.h b/include/net/wext.h
> index 80b31d8..6d76a39 100644
> --- a/include/net/wext.h
> +++ b/include/net/wext.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ extern int wext_proc_init(struct net *net);
> extern void wext_proc_exit(struct net *net);
> extern int wext_handle_ioctl(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr, unsigned int cmd,
> void __user *arg);
> +extern int compat_wext_handle_ioctl(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg);
Is it intentional that the prototypes are so different? Why not
pass a void __user *arg instead of unsigned long arg?
> +int compat_wext_handle_ioctl(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
For the conversion, you should also use compat_ptr() instead of the
cast. This currently only makes a difference on s390, which does
not have wireless, but it's better not to give wrong examples in the
code.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists