[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080603182014.79a38d03@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:20:14 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: akataria@...are.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>, Tim Mann <mann@...are.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Sahil Rihan <srihan@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:41:09 -0700
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com> wrote:
> On X86 platform we can use the value of cpu_khz computed during tsc
> calibration to calculate the loops_per_jiffy value. Its very
> important to keep the error in lpj values to minimum as any error in
> that may result in kernel panic in check_timer.
> In virtualization environment on a highly overloaded host, the guest
> delay calibration may sometimes result in errors beyond the ~50% that
> timer_irq_works can handle, resulting in the guest panicking.
\
can you guarantee that the rate tsc ticks at is the same as the current
CPU frequency? Answer: You can't....
sadly we do need to calibrate this...
In addition, clearly you can have different cpus in a system run at a
different rate (both in terms of cpu_khz and, independently, in terms
of tsc rate)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists