linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make x86 latest boot with non-discontig boxes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d6222a80806040621g1e59491bjf02f55d9082986c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:21:52 -0300
From:	"Glauber Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Glauber Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make x86 latest boot with non-discontig boxes

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit 0596152388e234efebce464355186ad9e16c8cb6 broke my box, since it
>> removes completely the call to memory_present() at e820 setup.
>>
>> It seems to be really not needed with discontig memory, but with flat
>> and sparse, I get an early crash. The proposed patch moves the call
>> memory_present() to setup_memory, the one present in setup_32.c.
>
> thanks for tracking it down. Could you check whether the latest
> x86/master tree works fine now?

boots beautifully.

-- 
Glauber Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/