[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080604152647.GA4189@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:26:47 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] quota: Split out quota_struct.h out of quota.h
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:51:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-06-08 16:56:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:11:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>...
> > > --- a/include/linux/quota.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/quota.h
> > > @@ -37,13 +37,11 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > +#include <linux/quota_struct.h>
> > >...
> >
> > This breaks our userspace headers.
> >
> > Please always run "make headers_check" after touching #include's
> > under include/
> I didn't know this existed :) I'll use it in future. Thanks. The question
> is how to fix this. Probably the best would be if didn't have to export new
> header file, wouldn't it? We can split the headers into quota.h containing
> structures and all other userspace stuff and quota_func.h carrying other
> kernel-internal stuff like inline functions etc. Oh well...
Considering that quota.h #include's quota_struct.h it wouldn't be a
problem if the new header also gets exported to userspace.
At least I do not have any strong opinion regarding how to best organize
the quota headers - David (Cc'ed) might have a more input on this.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists