[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080604190146.GE4189@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:01:46 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@...il.com>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@...enic.com>,
linux-embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console - Add configurable support for console charset
translation
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:34:32PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:33:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >My gut feeling is that the influence of this kind of linux-tiny patches
> >is hardly noticably compared to the overall code size development, but
> >if you have numbers that prove me wrong just point me to them and I'll
> >stand corrected.
> >
> >cu
> >Adrian
> >
> >BTW: I'm not insisting on "between 2.6.16 and 2.6.26", that's just some
> > timeframe big enough for showing general trends.
>
> Current kernels are too big, they tend to be about 1MB (ignoring lzma or
> gz compression), a couple of years back an ide- and network-enabled
> kernel with 8139too (or whatever -nic you use in qemu nowadays) was at
> least 30% smaller.
No disagreement that the kernel could (and should) become smaller for
situations where the kernel size matters.
My question is only about whether *this kind of patches* is the correct
approach.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists