linux-kernel - Re: Who can backport the AHCI driver to older kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080604193651.GU19431@lug-owl.de>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:36:51 +0200
From:	Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To:	Rainer Koenig <Rainer.Koenig@...itsu-siemens.com>
Cc:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Who can backport the AHCI driver to older kernels

On Wed, 2008-06-04 06:50:12 +0200, Rainer Koenig <Rainer.Koenig@...itsu-siemens.com> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. Juni 2008 14:07 schrieb Mikael Pettersson:
> > Redhat seems to regularly backport the entire libata layer
> > to at least 2.6.18 (RHEL5) and maybe also 2.6.9 (RHEL4).
> 
> Yes indeed we get perfect support from both Red Hat and SUSE for their 
> enterprise level distribution. I already got a driver kit for the 
> SLES10 kernel. The problem is that the targeted market is not willing
> to use enterprise level (which means spend money for subscription) 
> distros. They go for the "free" (as in free beer) distros and suffer 
> from missing drivers. 

Erm... Maybe you'd install a newer version of eg. Debian. At least
here, I have:

jbglaw@...aptop:~$ uname -a
Linux jblaptop 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Tue May 27 15:38:35 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
jbglaw@...aptop:~$

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@...-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
 Signature of:                    Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
 the second  :

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)