[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080604160341.7f8e5014.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:03:41 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: markh@...pro.net
Cc: dmarkh@....rr.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
ioe-lkml@...eria.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...ivas.org, dfults@....com, devik@....cz, sivanich@....com,
dino@...ibm.com, emmanuel.pacaud@...v-poitiers.fr,
deweerdt@...e.fr, mingo@...e.hu, colpatch@...ibm.com,
maxk@...lcomm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, oleg@...sign.ru,
paulmck@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com, rddunlap@...l.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may
have realtime uses)
Mark wrote:
> Yes to both questions. However after reading Max and Peter's response, I
> guess there is another, probably better or _only_, way to get what I really
> need anyway so please don't consider my intrusion into this thread as a NAK.
>
> I do not rely on this option as it is implemented.
Thank-you for your clearly stated conclusions, and thanks for stopping by.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists