[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080604.144950.117343339.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joseph@...esourcery.com
Cc: galak@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: math-emu issue with fp divide
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@...esourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:42:55 +0000 (UTC)
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to move the powerpc math-emu
> > code to use the include/math-emu bits.
>
> I'd like to remind people that the include/math-emu code is based on an
> old, buggy version of the soft-fp code in glibc. RTH previously noted
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-02/msg00075.html> that the fixes
> should go in the kernel, when approving a patch of mine fixing various
> bugs and speeding up soft-fp, and several more bugs have been fixed since
> then in the course of GCC work on soft-float for Power and __float128
> support for x86_64.
>
> So it may be better than the old code you're replacing, but it might still
> be a good idea to merge things with the current glibc code, as a matter of
> both correctness and performance. (And there may well still be bugs left
> in the code.)
Once the GCC folks started looking into using the soft-fp bits I knew
this situation would develop. The kernel side would have some set of
fixes and the glibc/gcc side would have yet another set.
To be honest this doesn't surprise me...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists