[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0806050005400.28685@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:08:26 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
cc: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Olaf Dabrunz <od@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Boot IRQ quirks and rerouting
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Jon Masters wrote:
> *). Top level handler is *tiny*. It's job is to get called (along with
> every other such function registered for a particular IRQ line) and
> determine if its device generated the interrupt, and to acknowledge,
> preventing the device from asserting the IRQ line any longer.
>
> The top part is called in hard IRQ context, even on RT.
>
> *). Bottom level is automatically scheduled by the kernel in response to
> the top part acknowledging that its device caused the interrupt.
>
> The bottom part is run inside a dedicated kernel thread.
I see what you mean -- well, with sane hardware that should be doable
with little effort indeed.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists