[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48460B94.8050000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:57:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: per_cpu_counter_sum lockdep warning
Saw this warning on an x86_64 box, while booting up 2.6.26-rc4. Has anybody else
seen it? Working on it?
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.26-rc4 #2
---------------------------------
inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
init/1 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&fbc->lock){+...}, at: [<ffffffff80386382>] __percpu_counter_sum+0xf/0x5a
{in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
irq event stamp: 694563
hardirqs last enabled at (694563): [<ffffffff80297533>] kmem_cache_free+0x1a9/0x1bb
hardirqs last disabled at (694562): [<ffffffff802973aa>] kmem_cache_free+0x20/0x1bb
softirqs last enabled at (692960): [<ffffffff8023a27b>] __do_softirq+0xda/0xe3
softirqs last disabled at (692945): [<ffffffff8020c4ac>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by init/1.
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.26-rc4 #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff802518e6>] print_usage_bug+0x15e/0x16f
[<ffffffff8025281f>] mark_lock+0x22f/0x416
[<ffffffff80386382>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0xf/0x5a
[<ffffffff80253576>] __lock_acquire+0x4e7/0xc8a
[<ffffffff80386382>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0xf/0x5a
[<ffffffff80253da7>] lock_acquire+0x8e/0xb2
[<ffffffff80386382>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0xf/0x5a
[<ffffffff805990d7>] _spin_lock+0x26/0x53
[<ffffffff80386382>] __percpu_counter_sum+0xf/0x5a
[<ffffffff803139e2>] ext3_statfs+0xd6/0x160
[<ffffffff8029c6be>] vfs_statfs+0x4e/0x6d
[<ffffffff8029c85f>] vfs_statfs_native+0x22/0x48
[<ffffffff8029c945>] sys_statfs+0x4d/0x89
[<ffffffff80252bfe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xf9/0x124
[<ffffffff8037da3d>] ? __up_read+0x8f/0x97
[<ffffffff8024ad5a>] ? up_read+0x26/0x2a
[<ffffffff80598cf0>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a
[<ffffffff80252bfe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xf9/0x124
[<ffffffff80598cf0>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a
[<ffffffff8020b1fb>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists