linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 and mpc8xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080603211530.d6b3755a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:15:30 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	avorontsov@...mvista.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	wim@...ana.be, scottwood@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 and
 mpc8xx

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:07:20 +1000 Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:

> Looking at Linus' git tree, it's evident that some subsystems use the
> the "[SUBSYSTEM]" notation and some use "subsystem:".  If there is now
> an edict from on high that only "subsystem:" is acceptable, then I
> must have missed that memo.

I'm all edicted out.  Sometimes one just puts forth the reasoning and
lets others decide whether it's worth bothering about.  I could understand
that decision being "no" :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/