[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080604140329.8db1b67e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:03:29 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] memcg: hardwall hierarhcy for memcg
Hard-Wall hierarchy support for memcg.
- new member hierarchy_model is added to memcg.
Only root cgroup can modify this only when there is no children.
Adds following functions for supporting HARDWALL hierarchy.
- try to reclaim memory at the change of "limit".
- try to reclaim all memory at force_empty
- returns resources to the parent at destroy.
Changelog v2->v3
- added documentation.
- hierarhcy_model parameter is added.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
Documentation/controllers/memory.txt | 27 +++++-
mm/memcontrol.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
struct mem_cgroup_lru_info info;
int prev_priority; /* for recording reclaim priority */
+
+ int hierarchy_model; /* used hierarchical policy */
/*
* statistics.
*/
@@ -144,6 +146,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
};
static struct mem_cgroup init_mem_cgroup;
+
+#define MEMCG_NO_HIERARCHY (0)
+#define MEMCG_HARDWALL_HIERARCHY (1)
+
/*
* We use the lower bit of the page->page_cgroup pointer as a bit spin
* lock. We need to ensure that page->page_cgroup is at least two
@@ -792,6 +798,89 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_st
}
/*
+ * Memory Controller hierarchy support.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * shrink usage to be res->usage + val < res->limit.
+ */
+
+int memcg_shrink_val(struct res_counter *cnt, unsigned long long val)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = container_of(cnt, struct mem_cgroup, res);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 1;
+ int progress = 1;
+
+retry:
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ /* Need to shrink ? */
+ if (cnt->usage + val <= cnt->limit)
+ ret = 0;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!progress)
+ return 1;
+ progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ goto retry;
+}
+
+/*
+ * For Hard Wall Hierarchy.
+ */
+
+int mem_cgroup_resize_callback(struct res_counter *cnt,
+ unsigned long long val, int what)
+{
+ unsigned long flags, borrow;
+ unsigned long long diffs;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ BUG_ON(what != RES_LIMIT);
+
+ /* Is this under hierarchy ? */
+ if (!cnt->parent) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ cnt->limit = val;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ if (val > cnt->limit) {
+ diffs = val - cnt->limit;
+ borrow = 1;
+ } else {
+ diffs = cnt->limit - val;
+ borrow = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+
+ if (borrow)
+ ret = res_counter_move_resource(cnt,diffs,
+ memcg_shrink_val,
+ MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES);
+ else
+ ret = res_counter_return_resource(cnt, diffs,
+ memcg_shrink_val,
+ MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+void memcg_shrink_all(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ unsigned long long val;
+
+ val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->res, RES_LIMIT);
+ memcg_shrink_val(&mem->res, val);
+}
+
+/*
* This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
* *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
*/
@@ -848,6 +937,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct
if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
return 0;
+ memcg_shrink_all(mem);
+
css_get(&mem->css);
/*
* page reclaim code (kswapd etc..) will move pages between
@@ -896,11 +987,44 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_write(struct c
struct file *file, const char __user *userbuf,
size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos)
{
- return res_counter_write(&mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont)->res,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
+
+ if (cft->private != RES_LIMIT
+ || !cont->parent
+ || memcg->hierarchy_model == MEMCG_NO_HIERARCHY)
+ return res_counter_write(&memcg->res, cft->private, userbuf,
+ nbytes, ppos, mem_cgroup_write_strategy, NULL);
+ else
+ return res_counter_write(&memcg->res,
cft->private, userbuf, nbytes, ppos,
- mem_cgroup_write_strategy);
+ mem_cgroup_write_strategy,
+ mem_cgroup_resize_callback);
+}
+
+
+static u64 mem_cgroup_read_hierarchy(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ return memcg->hierarchy_model;
+}
+
+static int mem_cgroup_write_hierarchy(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
+ u64 val)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ /* chage policy is allowed to ROOT cgroup && no children */
+ if (cgrp->parent)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!list_empty(&cgrp->children))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (val == 0 || val == 1) {
+ memcg->hierarchy_model = val;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return -EINVAL;
}
+
static int mem_cgroup_reset(struct cgroup *cont, unsigned int event)
{
struct mem_cgroup *mem;
@@ -992,6 +1116,16 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[]
.name = "stat",
.read_map = mem_control_stat_show,
},
+ {
+ .name = "hierarchy_model",
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read_hierarchy,
+ .write_u64 = mem_cgroup_write_hierarchy,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "assigned_to_child",
+ .private = RES_FOR_CHILDREN,
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read,
+ },
};
static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
@@ -1056,19 +1190,27 @@ static void mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_c
static struct cgroup_subsys_state *
mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
{
- struct mem_cgroup *mem;
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem, *parent;
int node;
if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
page_cgroup_cache = KMEM_CACHE(page_cgroup, SLAB_PANIC);
+ parent = NULL;
} else {
mem = mem_cgroup_alloc();
if (!mem)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
}
- res_counter_init(&mem->res);
+ if (!parent || parent->hierarchy_model == MEMCG_NO_HIERARCHY) {
+ res_counter_init(&mem->res);
+ mem->hierarchy_model = MEMCG_NO_HIERARCHY;
+ } else {
+ res_counter_init_hierarchy(&mem->res, &parent->res);
+ mem->hierarchy_model = parent->hierarchy_model;
+ }
for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
if (alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node))
@@ -1096,6 +1238,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cg
int node;
struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
+ if (cont->parent &&
+ mem->hierarchy_model == MEMCG_HARDWALL_HIERARCHY) {
+ /* we did what we can...just returns what we borrow */
+ res_counter_return_resource(&mem->res, -1, NULL, 0);
+ }
+
for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node);
Index: temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
===================================================================
--- temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
+++ temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
@@ -237,12 +237,37 @@ cgroup might have some charge associated
tasks have migrated away from it. Such charges are automatically dropped at
rmdir() if there are no tasks.
-5. TODO
+5. Hierarchy Model
+ the kernel supports following kinds of hierarchy models.
+ (your middle-ware may support others based on this.)
+
+ 5-a. Independent Hierarchy
+ There are no relationship between any cgroups, even among a parent and
+ children. This is the default mode. To use this hierarchy, write 0
+ to root cgroup's memory.hierarchy_model
+ echo 0 > .../memory.hierarchy_model.
+
+ 5-b. Hardwall Hierarchy.
+ The resource has to be moved from the parent to the child before use it.
+ When a child's limit is set to 'val', val of the resource is moved from
+ the parent to the child. the parent's usage += val.
+ The amount of children's usage is reported by the file
+
+ - memory.assigned_to_child
+
+ This policy doesn't provide sophisticated automatic resource balancing in
+ the kernel. But this is very good for strict resource isolation. Users
+ can get high predictability of behavior of applications if this is used
+ under proper environments.
+
+
+6. TODO
1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
4. Start reclamation when the limit is lowered
+ (this is already done in Hardwall Hierarchy)
5. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists