linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce task cgroup (#task restrictioon for prevent fork bomb by cgroup)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f11576a0806050356ua1d86fo3a46863d21f195f5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:56:32 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Daisuke Nishimura" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc:	containers@...ts.osdl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Li Zefan" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce task cgroup (#task restrictioon for prevent fork bomb by cgroup)

Hi Nishimura-san,

Thanks good point out.

>> +#include <linux/res_counter.h>
> I don't think it's needed.
> Or, are you planning to implement this feature by using res_counter?

your are right.
my early version use res_counter, but it isn't used currently.


>> +     spin_lock(&taskcg->lock);
>> +     if (max_tasks < taskcg->nr_tasks)
>> +             return -EBUSY;
> need spin_unlock().

Yes, of cource.
I'll fix it.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/