[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080605120829.GI11300@solarflare.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:08:30 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cputopology: Always define CPU topology information [4th try]
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:44:56 +0100 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
>
> > Not all architectures and configurations define CPU topology information.
> > This can result in an empty topology directory in sysfs, and requires
> > in-kernel users to protect all uses with #ifdef - see
> > <http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120639033904472&w=2>.
> >
> > The documentation of CPU topology specifies what the defaults should be
> > if only partial information is available from the hardware. So we can
> > provide these defaults as a fallback.
> >
> > This patch:
> >
> > - Adds default definitions of the 4 topology macros to <linux/topology.h>
> > - Changes drivers/base/topology.c to use the topology macros unconditionally
> > and to cope with definitions that aren't lvalues
> > - Updates documentation accordingly
>
> See, this is what I meant. After your patch we have:
[...]
Sorry, I don't know how that escaped me. My changes to the show functions
should be unnecessary - though I think that the two different implementations
for lvalues and rvalues are a premature optimisation.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists