[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080605123933.GA22737@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:39:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: make generic arch support NUMAQ
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) || defined(CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH)
>
> I counted several places where you test for the above. Introducing a
> CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ_OR_GENERIC would simplify stuff.
Yinghai, please get rid of the NUMAQ build option altogether and
eliminate the subarch.
We should keep a compatibility CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ that selects
X86_GENERICARCH, so that 'make oldconfig' on a NUMAQ config does the
right thing - but it's not a subarch anymore nor anything
user-configurable.
All that together would be a very nice simplification.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists