[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080605165104.GI15502@duo.random>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:51:04 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] mmu-notifier-core v17
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:07:52PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The hlist_del_init_rcu() primitive looks good.
>
> The rest of the RCU code looks fine assuming that "mn->ops->release()"
> either does call_rcu() to defer actual removal, or that the actual
> removal is deferred until after mmu_notifier_release() returns.
Yes, actual removal is deferred until after mmu_notifier_release()
returns.
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks for the review Paul! I should also have added your precious
Acked-by to the 1/3 and 3/3 but the important is the ack by email ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists