linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC v3] OF: OpenFirmware bindings for the mmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080605172723.GA14514@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:27:23 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Gary Jennejohn <garyj@...x.de>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC v3] OF: OpenFirmware bindings for the mmc_spi
	driver

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:45:17AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Anton Vorontsov
> <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
> > Here is v3. I'm out of ideas if you won't like it. :-)
> >
> > v3:
> > - Now these bindings are using bus notifiers chain, thus we adhere to the
> >  spi bus.
> >
> >  By the way, this scheme (IMO) looks good for I2C devices which needs
> >  platform_data extracted from the device tree too (Cc'ing Jochen).
> >
> > - Plus changed the OF bindings themselves, implemented voltage-range
> >  property. (Pierre, please take a look at vddrange_to_ocrmask(). I
> >  wonder if you would like this in the MMC core instead, with a kernel
> >  doc, of course.)
> >
> > v2:
> > - Bindings were adhered to the MMC_SPI driver. Withdrawn by Pierre Ossman.
> 
> Personally I think your v2 was better, and if I'm interpreting
> Pierre's comments correctly I think his main point is that instead of
> using the 'stock' probe/remove hooks for the spi mmc driver, the
> driver should be mildly reworked to provide a common block of code
> that can be used by both the OF and non-OF versions of the
> probe/remove routines.  I also think that is the way to go.

Well, I mentioned the usb_add_hcd()-alike approach for the mmc_spi
host... The absence of enthusiasm I equaled to "no".

Heh.

p.s.
Btw, you forgot another downside of v2 approach: struct spi_driver
duplication... Not sure if everyone will be happy about it.

Though, v2 is only version where we can make modular OF_MMC_SPI.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/