[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440806051033k7a0a5306qc22555d3ebd48757@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:33:37 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: make generic arch support NUMAQ
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
>> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) || defined(CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH)
>>
>> I counted several places where you test for the above. Introducing a
>> CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ_OR_GENERIC would simplify stuff.
>
> Yinghai, please get rid of the NUMAQ build option altogether and
> eliminate the subarch.
>
> We should keep a compatibility CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ that selects
> X86_GENERICARCH, so that 'make oldconfig' on a NUMAQ config does the
> right thing - but it's not a subarch anymore nor anything
> user-configurable.
how about the Summit, and ES7000? You still have the two entries for them.
Anyway, will remove entry in the list and make CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ select
X86_GENERICARCH
and make the those ifdef only use X86_GENERICARCH...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists