[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48483BA9.1070200@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:16:57 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] firmware: moving drivers to request_firmware()
David Woodhouse wrote:
> Ignoring the set of 'make fw->data const' patches which have mostly
> been already posted and are fairly trivial, this is the current content
> of the firmware tree at git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/firmware-2.6.git
>
> It starts by giving a way to build arbitrary firmware blobs into the
> kernel while letting request_firmware() find them there, and then sets
> about converting drivers to use request_firmware() instead of static
> data blobs, now that we can do that without forcing the users to
> actually satisfy the firmware requests from userspace.
>
> Rather than including binary blobs in the git tree, we carry them as
> .ihex files -- which as an added bonus can have comments and licensing
> information appended after the EOF record.
>
> For the USB drivers which actually _want_ Intel HEX files in their
> original form as individual records, we have a binary representation
> of such and a tool to convert the original .HEX files into .fw files
> in that form. And associated helpers in the kernel for validating and
> using them.
>
> We also add a 'make firmware_install' target, which is intended to
> install the firmware blobs into /lib/firmware/ where the userspace
> loader to find them.
Why do we need the .ihex format?
We should be loading firmwares exactly as they come from the vendor,
without any wrappers.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists