[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080605152953.dcfefa47.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:29:53 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, menage@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: prevent bound kthreads from changing
cpus_allowed
A couple of questions on this:
1) Sometimes threads are bound to a set of CPUs, such as the CPUs
on a particular node:
drivers/pci/pci-driver.c: set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, nodecpumask);
net/sunrpc/svc.c: set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, nodecpumask);
Such cases can't invoke kthread_bind(), as that only binds to a single CPU.
I only see one place in your patch that sets PF_THREAD_BOUND; would it make
sense for such multi-CPU binds as above to be PF_THREAD_BOUND as well?
2) Sometimes calls to kthread_bind are binding to any online cpu, such as in:
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c: kthread_bind(cct->task, any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
In such cases, the PF_THREAD_BOUND seems inappropriate. The caller of
kthread_bind() really doesn't seem to care where that thread is bound;
they just want it on a CPU that is still online.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists