| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48475B96.1030102@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:20:54 +0900
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kristen.c.accardi@...el.com, greg@...ah.com, lenb@...nel.org,
pbadari@...ibm.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4, v14] PCI, ACPI: Physical PCI slot objects
Alex-san,
Thank you for updated patch. I'll try it.
Unfortunately, I'm a little busy on the other jobs, so the test
report might be delayed until the beginning of next week.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
Alex Chiang wrote:
> Hi Kenji-san,
>
> * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>:
>> I tried to test your patch using latest linux-next, but I could
>> not apply your patch with the following messages:
>
> Sorry, that latest patch series was against Linus' tree, not
> linux-next.
>
>> I think maybe your patch is conflicting with the following patch.
>>
>> commit 372fa8fa0a77c47c7bcfae0ccd14e0c5f97d17fe
>> Author: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
>> Date: Fri May 2 06:02:41 2008 +0200
>>
>> driver-core: prepare for removal of 20 char limit from struct device
>>
>> The access of struct device->bus_id is replaced by dev_name(), to
>> be able to use the non-limited kobject name after the conversion
>> of the device register callers.
>
> Yes, thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed patch 1/4.
>
> I verified that patches 2, 3 and 4 apply cleanly against
> linux-next, so this should be the only fix you'll need.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> /ac
>
> commit c0175afea14cdaff3c33d894eb474eed1dcfa65d
> Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
> Date: Wed Jun 4 21:04:46 2008 -0600
>
> Construct one fakephp slot per PCI slot
>
> Register one slot per slot, rather than one slot per function. Change the
> name of the slot to fake%d instead of the pci address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
> Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/fakephp.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/fakephp.c
> index d3393f4..e066959 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/fakephp.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/fakephp.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct dummy_slot {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct work_struct remove_work;
> unsigned long removed;
> + char name[8];
> };
>
> static int debug;
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ static int add_slot(struct pci_dev *dev)
> struct dummy_slot *dslot;
> struct hotplug_slot *slot;
> int retval = -ENOMEM;
> + static int count = 1;
>
> slot = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hotplug_slot), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!slot)
> @@ -114,15 +116,13 @@ static int add_slot(struct pci_dev *dev)
> slot->info->max_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> slot->info->cur_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>
> - slot->name = kstrdup(dev_name(&dev->dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!slot->name)
> - goto error_info;
> - dbg("slot->name = %s\n", slot->name);
> -
> dslot = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dummy_slot), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dslot)
> - goto error_name;
> + goto error_info;
>
> + slot->name = dslot->name;
> + snprintf(slot->name, sizeof(dslot->name), "fake%d", count++);
> + dbg("slot->name = %s\n", slot->name);
> slot->ops = &dummy_hotplug_slot_ops;
> slot->release = &dummy_release;
> slot->private = dslot;
> @@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ static int add_slot(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> error_dslot:
> kfree(dslot);
> -error_name:
> - kfree(slot->name);
> error_info:
> kfree(slot->info);
> error_slot:
> @@ -153,17 +151,17 @@ error:
> static int __init pci_scan_buses(void)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> - int retval = 0;
> + int lastslot = 0;
>
> while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
> - retval = add_slot(dev);
> - if (retval) {
> - pci_dev_put(dev);
> - break;
> - }
> + if (PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) > 0 &&
> + lastslot == PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn))
> + continue;
> + lastslot = PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn);
> + add_slot(dev);
> }
>
> - return retval;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void remove_slot(struct dummy_slot *dslot)
> @@ -301,23 +299,9 @@ static int enable_slot(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* find the hotplug_slot for the pci_dev */
> -static struct hotplug_slot *get_slot_from_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> -{
> - struct dummy_slot *dslot;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dslot, &slot_list, node) {
> - if (dslot->dev == dev)
> - return dslot->slot;
> - }
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -
> -
> static int disable_slot(struct hotplug_slot *slot)
> {
> struct dummy_slot *dslot;
> - struct hotplug_slot *hslot;
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> int func;
>
> @@ -327,41 +311,27 @@ static int disable_slot(struct hotplug_slot *slot)
>
> dbg("%s - physical_slot = %s\n", __func__, slot->name);
>
> - /* don't disable bridged devices just yet, we can't handle them easily... */
> - if (dslot->dev->subordinate) {
> - err("Can't remove PCI devices with other PCI devices behind it yet.\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - if (test_and_set_bit(0, &dslot->removed)) {
> - dbg("Slot already scheduled for removal\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - /* search for subfunctions and disable them first */
> - if (!(dslot->dev->devfn & 7)) {
> - for (func = 1; func < 8; func++) {
> - dev = pci_get_slot(dslot->dev->bus,
> - dslot->dev->devfn + func);
> - if (dev) {
> - hslot = get_slot_from_dev(dev);
> - if (hslot)
> - disable_slot(hslot);
> - else {
> - err("Hotplug slot not found for subfunction of PCI device\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - pci_dev_put(dev);
> - } else
> - dbg("No device in slot found\n");
> + for (func = 7; func >= 0; func--) {
> + dev = pci_get_slot(dslot->dev->bus, dslot->dev->devfn + func);
> + if (!dev)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(0, &dslot->removed)) {
> + dbg("Slot already scheduled for removal\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> - }
>
> - /* remove the device from the pci core */
> - pci_remove_bus_device(dslot->dev);
> + /* queue work item to blow away this sysfs entry and other
> + * parts.
> + */
> + INIT_WORK(&dslot->remove_work, remove_slot_worker);
> + queue_work(dummyphp_wq, &dslot->remove_work);
>
> - /* queue work item to blow away this sysfs entry and other parts. */
> - INIT_WORK(&dslot->remove_work, remove_slot_worker);
> - queue_work(dummyphp_wq, &dslot->remove_work);
> + /* blow away this sysfs entry and other parts. */
> + remove_slot(dslot);
>
> + pci_dev_put(dev);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists