linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:01:49 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:53:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:47:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > My third bisect iteration has hit this:
> > 
> > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'get_kmmio_probe':
> > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_for_each_entry_rcu'
> 
> You need the following patch from linux-next.  Which should be the commit
> immediately after the merge of the ftrace tree.

Well yes - I just bodged it by hand then unbodged it later.  But we
have a bisection break there.  Admittedly a minor one, unless the bug
you're bisecting for requires that kprobes be configured.  But it would
be nice to squish it.

I hope Ingo isn't following this
once-you've-checked-it-in-you-can't-fix-it stupidity :(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/