linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:28:58 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:23:25 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> hm, which commit is this exactly? I've never hit it myself in bisection 
> (and there are days when i bisect -tip several times). We'll respin 
> tip/tracing/mmiotrace if it's bisection-hostile. You can probably nudge 
> it into building via "git-bisect next".

See my other email.  This is because the ftrace tree does not merge well
with the rcu tree.

I may start merging such build breakage fixes into the actual merge
commits that cause them.  That will make linux-next more bisectable, but
means I have to remember that I did it for Linus' sake.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped