[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:49:49 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > most of the -tip topics (there are 75 of them currently) are present
> > in linux-next - about ~70% of all -tip commits are in linux-next
> > already. The stuff that is not in linux-next yet is either because
> > it's: miscellany fixes (i.e. intentionally grabbed out-of-tree to
> > make our tests work better), not cooked enough yet, or because we
> > are still working it out - tip is less than a month old still.
> >
> > in general the rule is that if there's anything we want to push
> > upstream, it will show up in linux-next.
>
> I don't think it's a good idea for you guys to be off working on
> 2.6.28 material when we're trying to stabilise 2.6.25, 2.6.26 and
> preparing for 2.6.27.
>
> What's especially regrettable is that, afaik, you are expending
> testing resources on a tree which nobody will ever run rather than
> upon the tree which everyone _will_ run :( [...]
what do you mean? We are testing commits that everybody will run and are
pre-filtering them for sanity and stability before they hit linux-next.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists