linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Added in user-injected messages into blk traces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:46:24 -0400
From:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added in user-injected messages into blk traces

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> 
>> This allows a user to annotate the blk trace stream: writing a suitable
>> message to {/sys/kernel/debug}/block/<dsf>/msg will have it propagated
>> into the trace stream.
> 
> Looks good to me, I think this can be useful for ease of trace
> annotation. Comments below.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alan D. Brunelle <alan.brunelle@...com>
>> ---
>>  block/blktrace.c             |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/blktrace_api.h |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blktrace.c b/block/blktrace.c
>> index 38e6b83..b9c4df2 100644
>> --- a/block/blktrace.c
>> +++ b/block/blktrace.c
>> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ err:
>>  static void blk_trace_cleanup(struct blk_trace *bt)
>>  {
>>  	relay_close(bt->rchan);
>> +	debugfs_remove(bt->msg_file);
>>  	debugfs_remove(bt->dropped_file);
>>  	blk_remove_tree(bt->dir);
>>  	free_percpu(bt->sequence);
>> @@ -299,6 +300,41 @@ static const struct file_operations blk_dropped_fops = {
>>  	.read =		blk_dropped_read,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static int blk_msg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> +{
>> +	filp->private_data = inode->i_private;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t blk_msg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buffer,
>> +				size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +	ssize_t ret = count;
>> +
>> +	if (count > BLK_TN_MAX_MSG)
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +	else {
>> +		char *msg = kmalloc(BLK_TN_MAX_MSG, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +		if (copy_from_user(msg, buffer, count))
>> +			ret = -EFAULT;
>> +		else {
>> +			struct blk_trace *bt = filp->private_data;
>> +			__trace_note_message(bt, "%s", msg);
>> +		}
>> +		kfree(msg);
> 
> Would be cleaner with an explicit !msg check, though I think
> copy_from_user() will notice and it'll work as-is.
> 
> if (count > BLK_TN_MAX_MSG)
>         return -EINVAL;
> 
> msg = kmalloc(BLK_TN_MAX_MSG, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!msg)
>         return -ENOMEM;
> 
> if (copy_from_user(msg, buffer, count))
>         return -EFAULT;
> 
> ...
> 
> is just a lot easier to directly follow imho. Otherwise I have no
> problems with it, if you fix that up we can queue it for 2.6.27
> inclusion.
> 

Good points, will clean up and resubmit.

Thanks,
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/