[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:13:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: don't call node_to_cpumask() on nodes > nr_node_ids
>
> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to
> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the index
> only got introduced by Mike's patch.
note that we already had these changes in tip/cpus4096, the fact that
PERCPU_DEBUG didnt properly detect the problem was icing on the cake.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists