linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 16/25] SHM_LOCKED pages are non-reclaimable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080607141333.9C4C.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:21:40 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 16/25] SHM_LOCKED pages are non-reclaimable

Hi

> > +static void check_move_noreclaim_page(struct page *page, struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +
> > +	ClearPageNoreclaim(page); /* for page_reclaimable() */
> 
> Confused.  Didn't we just lose track of our NR_NORECLAIM accounting?

I think this code is right.
this patch track it by below code.

but comments adding is better? 


> > +	if (page_reclaimable(page, NULL)) {
> > +		enum lru_list l = LRU_INACTIVE_ANON + page_file_cache(page);
> > +		__dec_zone_state(zone, NR_NORECLAIM);
> > +		list_move(&page->lru, &zone->list[l]);
> > +		__inc_zone_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l);
> > +	} else {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * rotate noreclaim list
> > +		 */
> > +		SetPageNoreclaim(page);
> > +		list_move(&page->lru, &zone->list[LRU_NORECLAIM]);
> > +	}
> > +}




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/