[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080607104740.6c12a324@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:47:40 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lee.schermerhorn@...com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 02/25] Use an indexed array for LRU variables
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:43:50 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mm_inline.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/include/linux/mm_inline.h 2008-05-23 14:21:21.000000000 -0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mm_inline.h 2008-05-23 14:21:33.000000000 -0400
> > > @@ -1,40 +1,51 @@
> > > static inline void
> > > +add_page_to_lru_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, enum lru_list l)
> > > +{
> > > + list_add(&page->lru, &zone->list[l]);
> > > + __inc_zone_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE + l);
> >
> > ^ that's a bug, isn't it?
>
> this is definitely bug.
I believe this is correct, actually. I will rename/alias it to
VMSCAN_BASE or something along those lines.
> > oh, no it isn't.
> > Can we rename NR_INACTIVE? Maybe VMSCAN_BASE or something?
>
> as far as i remembered, old version use LRU_INACTIVE.
LRU_* is used to index LRU arrays.
NR_* is used as an offset into the zone state.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists