[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484B02CF.6000606@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:51:11 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, jejb@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Marcin Krol <hawk@...-linux.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 21/50] brd: dont show ramdisks in /proc/partitions
Chris Wright wrote:
> From: Marcin Krol <hawk@...-linux.org>
>
> I also think that someone somewhere (long time ago) excluded ramdisks from
> /proc/partitions for good reasons. It is possible that now such new
> "feature" is harmless, but I think there are more chances that someone
> will say "hey, /proc/partitions has changed, now my software doesn't work"
> then "hey where did my new 2.6.25 feature go". nbd devices are also
> excluded, maybe for very same (unknown to me) reasons.
This seems a bit like cargo cult programming to me. If there isn't a
known, good, reason to revert this behaviour change, I would consider it
a bugfix, not a regression.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists