[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080607233640.GA9266@homac>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 01:36:40 +0200
From: Holger Macht <hmacht@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
len.brown@...el.com, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk,
davej@...emonkey.org.uk
Subject: Re: bug? acpi p-state + ondemand keeps dropping max freq
On Sat 07. Jun - 14:54:35, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 23:39:18 +0200
> Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > > # echo 1866000 > scaling_max_freq ; cat scaling_max_freq
> > > 800000
> > > # echo 1866000 > scaling_max_freq ; cat scaling_max_freq
> > > 800000
> > >
> > >
> > > This renders my Dothan to utterly poor speeds. (standard T43)
> > >
> > > performance cpufreq governor makes no difference - I still can't
> > > change the frequency upper/lower values.
> >
> > Hmm, I have similar problem in Novell bugzilla, on very different hw:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
> >
> > Pavel
> >
>
>
> are either of you running gnome-power-manager or kpowersaved ?
> sometimes these programs (and more likely, the patches added by a
> distro maintainer who doesn't fully realize how power works) tend to
> muck with kernel settings around CPU frequency that they have
> absolutely no business touching...
I'm not aware of any 'brand' of kpowersave or gnome-power-manager which
could interfere here. Nor I'm aware of any backends in recent distros
which tweak the 'max freq' knobs. So I don't think this can be related. Or
please be a little bit more detailed about what you're referring to...
Regards,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists