| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:22:31 -0400 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 06/25] split LRU lists into anon & file sets On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:04:39 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > The changelogs are a bit scrappy and could do with some care > > - stale assertions such as the above > > - "From:<random number of spaces>Lee" in various places > > - Some have the --- separator and others don't (this trips me up). > > - Stuff like "Against: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1" right in the middle of the > changelog for me to hunt down and squish. I got rid of all of those - until I merged in Lee's latest :( > - "TODO: DEBUGGING ONLY: NOT FOR UPSTREAM MERGE" <<-- what's up with this? I'll remove this one. > - random Capitalisation in Various patch Titles. > > - "V2 -> V3:" logging in the main changelog - not relevant in the > final commit hence more for me to edit away. I got rid of all of those - again, before merging Lee's latest. Then I got rid of most of them, but apparently missed a few... > - Strange inventions like "Originally Signed-off-by:" > > - please prefer to prefix the patch titles with a suitable subsystem > identifier. In this case "vmscan: " would suit. Will do. > - Other stuff I forgot. A general recheck and cleanup would be nice. > > I've actually fixed all ofthe above but I don't yet know whether > I'll be checking all this in. > > > Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/fs/proc/proc_misc.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2008-05-23 14:21:21.000000000 -0400 > > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2008-05-23 14:21:34.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ static int meminfo_read_proc(char *page, > > unsigned long allowed; > > struct vmalloc_info vmi; > > long cached; > > + unsigned long inactive_anon; > > + unsigned long active_anon; > > + unsigned long inactive_file; > > + unsigned long active_file; > > Shouldn't this be an array[NR_LRU_LISTS]? > > > /* > > * display in kilobytes. > > @@ -150,48 +154,61 @@ static int meminfo_read_proc(char *page, > > > > get_vmalloc_info(&vmi); > > > > + inactive_anon = global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON); > > + active_anon = global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON); > > + inactive_file = global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE); > > + active_file = global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE); > > then this can perhaps become a loop. Sure, I can do that. > > /* > > * Tagged format, for easy grepping and expansion. > > */ > > len = sprintf(page, > > - "MemTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > - "MemFree: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Buffers: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Cached: %8lu kB\n" > > - "SwapCached: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Active: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Inactive: %8lu kB\n" > > + "MemTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > + "MemFree: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Buffers: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Cached: %8lu kB\n" > > + "SwapCached: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Active: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Inactive: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Active(anon): %8lu kB\n" > > + "Inactive(anon): %8lu kB\n" > > + "Active(file): %8lu kB\n" > > + "Inactive(file): %8lu kB\n" > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM > > - "HighTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > - "HighFree: %8lu kB\n" > > - "LowTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > - "LowFree: %8lu kB\n" > > -#endif > > - "SwapTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > - "SwapFree: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Dirty: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Writeback: %8lu kB\n" > > - "AnonPages: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Mapped: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Slab: %8lu kB\n" > > - "SReclaimable: %8lu kB\n" > > - "SUnreclaim: %8lu kB\n" > > - "PageTables: %8lu kB\n" > > - "NFS_Unstable: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Bounce: %8lu kB\n" > > - "WritebackTmp: %8lu kB\n" > > - "CommitLimit: %8lu kB\n" > > - "Committed_AS: %8lu kB\n" > > - "VmallocTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > - "VmallocUsed: %8lu kB\n" > > - "VmallocChunk: %8lu kB\n", > > + "HighTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > + "HighFree: %8lu kB\n" > > + "LowTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > + "LowFree: %8lu kB\n" > > +#endif > > + "SwapTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > + "SwapFree: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Dirty: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Writeback: %8lu kB\n" > > + "AnonPages: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Mapped: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Slab: %8lu kB\n" > > + "SReclaimable: %8lu kB\n" > > + "SUnreclaim: %8lu kB\n" > > + "PageTables: %8lu kB\n" > > + "NFS_Unstable: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Bounce: %8lu kB\n" > > + "WritebackTmp: %8lu kB\n" > > + "CommitLimit: %8lu kB\n" > > + "Committed_AS: %8lu kB\n" > > + "VmallocTotal: %8lu kB\n" > > + "VmallocUsed: %8lu kB\n" > > + "VmallocChunk: %8lu kB\n", > > K(i.totalram), > > K(i.freeram), > > K(i.bufferram), > > K(cached), > > K(total_swapcache_pages), > > - K(global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE)), > > - K(global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE)), > > + K(active_anon + active_file), > > + K(inactive_anon + inactive_file), > > + K(active_anon), > > + K(inactive_anon), > > + K(active_file), > > + K(inactive_file), > > Do we really want to put all this stuff into /proc/meminfo? > > Would it be better to aggregate it in some manner for meminfo and show > the fine-grained info in /proc/vmstat? Good question. I believe we'll want the memory usage statistics in /proc/meminfo, but more temporary internal stuff like "writebacktmp" and "nfs_unstable" might not belong there. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists